Kurumun Atıf Alan Makalesi
Atıf Alan Yayın
Antibacterial activities of Turkish pollen and propolis extracts against plant bacterial pathogens
Scopus
Toplam 118 atıf DOI
The "in vitro" antibacterial activities of Turkish pollen and propolis extracts were investigated against 13 different species of agricultural bacterial pathogens including Agrobacterium tumefaciens, A. vitis, Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, Erwinia amylovora, E. carotovora pv. carotovora, Pseudomonas corrugata, P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi, P. syringae pv. phaseolicola, P. syringae pv. syringae, P. syringae pv. tomato, Ralstonia solanacearum, Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris and X. axonopodis pv. vesicatoria. Among the tested bacteria, A. tumefaciens was the most sensitive one to 1/5 concentration of pollen extract, and the sensitivity of the bacteria followed the sequence A. tumefaciens > P. syringae pv. tomato, X. axonopodis pv. vesicatoria > E. amylovora, P. corrugata, R. solanacearum, X. campestris pv. campestris > A. vitis, C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis > E. carotovora pv. carotovora, P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi, P. syringae pv. phaseolicola > P. syringae pv. syringae. P. syringae pv. phaseolicola was the most sensitive one to 1/10 concentration of propolis extract, and the sensitivity of the bacteria followed the sequence P. syringae pv. phaseolicola > P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi, P. corrugata, R. solanacearum > E. carotovora pv. carotovora, P. syringae pv. syringae, E. amylovora, A. tumefaciens, A. vitis, C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, P. syringae pv. tomato, X. campestris pv. campestris, X. axonopodis pv. vesicatoria. The least active concentrations towards the tested bacteria were 1/100 of the pollen extract and 1/1000 of the propolis extract. This study is the first report on the antibacterial activities of pollen and propolis against the plant pathogenic bacteria. © 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Atıf Kaynağı
Atıf Yapan Yayın
Antibacterial activity of pollen and propolis extracts
Scopus
Havuzumuzda 7 atıf almış
The antimicrobial activities of different concentrations of pollen and propolis extracts were determined against nine food-borne pathogens (Streptococcus salivarius RSHE 605, Listeria monocytogenes NCTC 5348, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Salmonella enteritidis ATCC 13076, Staphylococcus pneumoniae ATCC 10015, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Klebsiella pneumoniae NCTC 5049, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and Bacillus anthracis) in model systems. The extracts and antibiotic discs (ciprofloxacin, cefaperazon sulbaktam, penicilline, amikacine, cefepime, gentamicine, ceftriaxone) exhibited inhibitory effect at the varying levels against tested bacteria. Among the tested bacteria, L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa were the most sensitive ones to 50 ppm concentrations of both extracts. The highest effect concentrations towards B. anthracis were 600 ppm dose of pollen and propolis extracts. The 400 and 600 ppm levels of propolis extracts on L. monocytogenes NCTC 5348 exhibited similar antimicrobial effects compared with amikacine, gentamicine and ceftriaxone antibiotics. Also, 600 ppm concentration of propolis had higher effect against B. anthracis compared with cefepime, gentamicine and ceftriaxone antibiotics. The inhibitory effect of propolis extract was found to be higher than that of pollen against tested bacteria. Propolis especially appears to be promising in this respect.
Atıf Yapan Makale Bilgileri
Kurumlar (2)
College of Health Care University of Selçuk
Turkey
Selçuk Üniversitesi
Selçuklu, Turkey