CANLI
Yükleniyor Veriler getiriliyor…
/ Atıflar / Detay

Atıf Detayı

Kurum makalesi · Scopus üzerinden alınan atıf kaydı

Kurumun Atıf Alan Makalesi
Atıf Alan Yayın
Ultrastructural correlates of in vivo/in vitro bond degradation in self-etch adhesives
Journal of Dental Research Cilt 84 ss. 355-359
Scopus Toplam 125 atıf DOI
The morphologic correlates of bond degradation in self-etching primers have not been fully elucidated. We hypothesized that there is no difference between the mechanism of degradation of self-etching primers in vivo and in vitro. Class I cavities prepared in vivo in 24 caries-free human molars were bonded with Clearfil SE Bond or Clearfil Protect Bond, and restored with resin composites. Eight teeth were extracted after 24 hrs, and the rest after 1 yr. The same protocol was repeated in vitro with extracted molars. Degradation of resin-dentin bonds was assessed by microtensile bond testing and TEM of interfaces after tracer immersion. Both in vivo and in vitro bond strengths decreased with time for SE Bond but not for Protect Bond, with more pronounced water treeing observed in the former adhesive under both aging conditions. There is no difference between the mechanism of degradation of self-etch adhesives in vivo or in vitro.
Atıf Kaynağı
Atıf Yapan Yayın
Effect of artificial aging regimens on the performance of self-etching adhesives
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials Cilt 93 ss. 175-184
Scopus Havuzumuzda 40 atıf almış
This in vitro study was performed to compare the microtensile bond strengths (MTBS) of current self-etching adhesives to dentin and to evaluate the effects of artificial aging [(thermocycling (TC) and/or mechanic loading (ML)] on MTBS and on nanoleakage of self-etching adhesives. Two-step (AdheSE Bond, Clearfil Protect Bond, Clearfil SE Bond, Optibond Self-Etch) and one-step (Hybrid Bond, G-bond, Clearfil Tri-S Bond, and Adper Prompt L-Pop) self-etching adhesives were tested. Resin composite build-ups were created, and the specimens were subjected to 104 TC, 105 ML, and 10 4/105 TC/ML. Non-aged specimens served as controls. In the control group, no significant differences were found among the MTBS of the one-step self-etching adhesives and among those of three two-step self-etching adhesives (AdheSE Bond, Clearfil Protect Bond, and Clearfil SE Bond) (p > 0.05). The MTBS of AdheSE Bond and Clearfil Protect Bond were higher than were those of all one-step self-etching adhesives and than those of Optibond Self-Etch. The MTBS of Clearfil SE Bond was higher than were those of two one-step self-etching adhesives (Adper Prompt L-Pop, G-bond) (p < 0.05). Compared with the non-aged controls, TC did not decrease (p > 0.05), but ML and TC/ML significantly decreased the MTBS of the adhesives tested (p < 0.05). Two-step self-etching adhesives tended to fail more cohesively in dentin. Transmission electron microscopy revealed different nanoleakage patterns in the adhesive and hybrid layers of all adhesives examined, and signs of additional silver-filled water channels were more readily detectable after TC/ML. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Atıf Yapan Makale Bilgileri
Kurumlar (4)
Erciyes Üniversitesi Kayseri, Turkey
Selçuk Üniversitesi Selçuklu, Turkey
Universität Zürich Zurich, Switzerland
University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine Philadelphia, United States