CANLI
Yükleniyor Veriler getiriliyor…
/ Atıflar / Detay

Atıf Detayı

Kurum makalesi · Scopus üzerinden alınan atıf kaydı

Kurumun Atıf Alan Makalesi
Atıf Alan Yayın
Removal of boron from water by using reverse osmosis
Separation and Purification Technology Cilt 64 ss. 141-146
Scopus Toplam 146 atıf DOI
The removal of boron from water was investigated by using reverse osmosis (RO) technique with SWHR, BW-30 (FILMTEC) and AG (GE Osmonics) membranes, not considered previously. The effect of pH and concentration of the feed water and operating pressure on the boron rejection was investigated. The experimental results indicated that boron rejection mostly depends on membrane type, pH of the feed water and operating pressure. The results also showed that boron can be effectively removed only at feed water pH of 11. The lowest permeate boron concentration (the highest rejection, close to 99%) was obtained when SWHR membrane was used. The rejection efficiency of the membranes was found to be in the order of SWHR > BW-30 > AG. For all membranes, boron rejection increased with increasing operating pressure. Finally, two different natural (ground) water samples containing 24.8 and 9.4 mg/L of boron were treated by using RO with SWHR membrane and obtained results showed that RO could be efficiently used (with >95% rejection) for removal of boron from groundwaters. © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Atıf Kaynağı
Atıf Yapan Yayın
Removal of arsenate [As(V)] and arsenite [As(III)] from water by SWHR and BW-30 reverse osmosis
Desalination Cilt 281 ss. 88-92
Scopus Havuzumuzda 121 atıf almış
The removal of arsenate [As(V)] and arsenite [As(III)] from water was investigated by using reverse osmosis (RO) technique with SWHR and BW-30 (FILMTEC) membranes. The effect of pH and concentration of the feed water and operating pressure on the rejection of both arsenic species was examined. The experimental results indicated that rejection for both As(V) and As(III) mostly depended on the membrane type, pH of the feed water and operating pressure. For both membranes, As(V) rejection was maximum at pH above 4.0, while As(III) could be effectively removed from water at pH above 9.1. The rejection for both arsenic species increased with increasing operating pressure. The lowest permeate concentration of As(III) and As(V) was obtained when SWHR membrane was used. Finally, a natural (ground) water sample containing 50 μg/L of As(V) and 12 μg/L of As(III), respectively was treated by using RO with SWHR membrane. The obtained permeate concentration of total arsenic was compared with WHO and EU standards and permeate fluxes were evaluated by considering the chemical composition of the groundwater sample. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.
Atıf Yapan Makale Bilgileri
Kurumlar (1)
Selçuk Üniversitesi Selçuklu, Turkey