Kurumun Atıf Alan Makalesi
Atıf Alan Yayın
Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis)
Scopus
Toplam 193 atıf DOI
The aim of this study was to compare a fiber composite laminate (FCL) post core and a conventional cast post core system by using two different methods. The first method was a conventional fracture strength test, and the second was a finite elemental stress-analysis method (FEM). For the conventional fracture strength test, 20 extracted, human upper, central incisors were used. The teeth were decoronated, treated endodontically, and restored with two post core systems. After embedding the samples in resin blocks, a loading force was applied to the teeth at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/ min at an angle of 45 degrees to the long axis of the ooth. The data were recorded, and the results were compared by using the Mann-Whitney U test. There was no statistically significant difference between the two post systems (p>0.05). For FEM analysis, a pseudo three-dimensional model of a maxillary central incisor, theoretically restored with either a cast post or an FCL, was used. The analysis was performed by using the structural analysis program (SAP90). FEM analysis showed that stress was accumulated within the cast post core system, and transmission of stress to supportive structures and the tooth was low. This is an advantage for tooth and supporting tissues. When the FCL post core system was evaluated by FEM, the results indicated that this system transferr stress to supportive structures and the tooth while stress accumulation within the post system was low. This is an advantage for the restoration but disadvantage for the supporting tissues. Copyright © 2002 by The American Association of Endodontists.
Atıf Kaynağı
Atıf Yapan Yayın
Stress Distribution in Immature Incisors with Regenerative Endodontic Treatment: Which Coronal Restoration Performs Best? An FEA Study
Scopus
Havuzumuzda Open Access
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different coronal restoration methods on stresses in immature central incisors with regenerative endodontic treatment and excessive loss of coronal structure. Methods: A three-dimensional (3D) Finite Element Analysis (FEA) model of a maxillary central incisor treated with a 3 mm MTA coronal plug after regenerative endodontic treatment was created. Six different models were simulated: (1) intact immature tooth (control), (2) direct composite resin build-up, (3) fibre-reinforced composite build-up, (4) hybrid ceramic endocrown, (5) LiSi ceramic endocrown, and (6) endocore and ceramic crown restoration. Analyses were performed with SolidWorks/CosmosWorks, and a 150 N load was applied at a 135° angle. Results: Maximum tensile stresses were concentrated in the cervical region (4.577 MPa). Direct composite and fibre-reinforced restorations showed high stress in root dentin (3.891 and 3.841 MPa, respectively). The endocore/ceramic crown restoration (1.578 MPa) provided the closest stress distribution to the natural tooth (1.322 MPa). Conclusions: The biomechanical performance of the restoration–tooth complex depends on both the restorative material and the restoration design. In immature teeth undergoing regenerative endodontic treatment, the most biomechanically favourable restoration option was an endocore/ceramic crown.
Atıf Yapan Makale Bilgileri
Kurumlar (2)
Selçuk Üniversitesi
Selçuklu, Turkey
Süleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Medicine
Isparta, Turkey